------- Comment #6 from lloyd at randombit dot net 2006-01-17 21:39 ------- Thank you for the reference Gaby. I'm now not quite sure what purpose a pure virtual destructor has, or why it should be legal, but neither the apparent language oddity nor my confusion about same is a GCC problem, so... Andrew, Gaby, sorry to distract you with the invalid bug report. I'll check the standard first next time.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25826
