------- Comment #13 from hhinnant at apple dot com 2006-01-25 03:24 ------- (In reply to comment #11) > | Did you read comment 3? > > Yes. Is your claim that whether the copy constructor is converting or > not does not matter?
No. My suspicion is that there is a 99.99% chance that EDG is conforming to C++03 in this regard. And furthermore, their behavior (which is different from ours) is preferable to our customers. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25950
