Executing on host: /mnt/gnu/gcc-3.3/objdir/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../g++
-B/mnt/gn
u/gcc-3.3/objdir/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../
/mnt/gnu/gcc-3.3/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++
.dg/parse/register1.C  -nostdinc++
-I/mnt/gnu/gcc-3.3/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.
11/libstdc++-v3/include/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
-I/mnt/gnu/gcc-3.3/objdir/hppa2.0w
-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include
-I/mnt/gnu/gcc-3.3/gcc/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++
 -I/mnt/gnu/gcc-3.3/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/backward
-I/mnt/gnu/gcc-3.3/gcc/lib
stdc++-v3/testsuite -fmessage-length=0   -ansi -pedantic-errors -Wno-long-long
-S  -o register1.s    (timeout = 300)
/mnt/gnu/gcc-3.3/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/register1.C: In function 'C
f(C)
':
/mnt/gnu/gcc-3.3/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/register1.C:13: warning:
address
 requested for 'x', which is declared 'register'
output is:
/mnt/gnu/gcc-3.3/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/register1.C: In function 'C
f(C)
':
/mnt/gnu/gcc-3.3/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/register1.C:13: warning:
address
 requested for 'x', which is declared 'register'

FAIL: g++.dg/parse/register1.C (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/mnt/gnu/gcc-3.3/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/register1.C:13: warning:
address
 requested for 'x', which is declared 'register'

The same error also occurs in this test:

FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.brendan/warnings4.C (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/mnt/gnu/gcc-3.3/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.brendan/warnings4.C:7:
warni
ng: address requested for 'x', which is declared 'register'

This is a new fail in the last couple of days.


-- 
           Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/parse/register1.C (test for excess errors)
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.2.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
  GCC host triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
GCC target triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26130

Reply via email to