------- Comment #7 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-08 18:54 -------
The regex changes are unlikely to cause big destabilization for 3 reasons:
* They are pure java
* The regex code has historically been somewhat broken, so we're unlikely
to make the situation worse
* They've been tested in classpath using mauve
I'll look at this a bit. I'm leaning toward including the changes in 4.1
because we've seen more than one application now with regexes that hit
libgcj bugs.
Andrew, I agree with your point in general. We should probably discuss it
in some forum other than a random regex bug report though :-)
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-02-08 18:54:56
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26177
