------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-16 15:19 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Mark, why isn't this marked as a regression? Most likey because I and others did not notice it was a regression and could not tell from either the patch or the bug report it was.
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P2 |P3 Summary|builtin_apply uses wrong |[4.1/4.2 regression] |mode for multi-hard-register|builtin_apply uses wrong |return values |mode for multi-hard-register | |return values Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23868