------- Comment #18 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-22 16:30
-------
As this is a wrong-code regression for 4.1 (albeit on ia64-linux), Mark should
re-consider the priority and maybe allow this patch in. And the patch
submitter should have asked for that in the first place (and can now ask for it
please).
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25603
