------- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-14 18:57 ------- Subject: Re: boostrap failure due to warning in gcc/varasm.c
On Mar 14, 2006, at 1:55 PM, Graham Stott wrote: > All, > > If the warning isn't bogus then we probably need to do the shift in > two steps > (i.e. hwi = (hwi >> (shift - 1)) >> 1) as done elsewhere to avoid the > potential warning. The only reason why it is bogus is because well it is dead code :). -- Pinski -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26679
