------- Comment #3 from gary at intrepid dot com 2006-05-05 16:12 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Do you have a testcase this will better understand the problem and to see if > your patch is correct?
I'm not sure how to demonstrate that there is a problem. I think it is clear that the author of the function planned on using new_type instaed of type, and that it is incorrect to assert 'volatile' on a compiler temporary, but am uncertain as to whether asserting 'volatile' leads to any particular difficulties in the present compiler. I'm hoping one of the gimplify developers can help construct a test case, if applicable. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27445