------- Comment #17 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-08-22 20:36 -------
I agree that we should allow this behavior. Clearly the standard has nothing
to say about whether -fno-rtti should allow this or not, but the standard
has an explicit provision for the case of dynamic_cast<void*>.
Furthermore, we have a patch to both the code and the documentation that would
allow to get us back to the previous behavior (even if it was wrongly
documented). The patch is minimal and adds a useful feature. I don't see
why we should reject it.
W.
--
bangerth at dealii dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28687
