------- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 06:23 ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Is there a good reason why gcc can't officially support being built without a > libc by either figuring out that there's no libc itself or by offering some > kind of --i-do-not-have-a-libc option to configure?
Yes because you are configuring wrong in the first place. Try looking at what crosstool does for how to build a cross compiler. http://kegel.com/crosstool/ -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28962
