------- Comment #3 from irar at il dot ibm dot com 2006-09-19 07:10 ------- > t.c:20: note: not vectorized: mixed data-types > t.c:20: note: can't determine vectorization factor. > > Removing flags[i] = true;
Multiple data-types vectorization is already supported in the autovect branch, and the patches for mainline (starting from http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg00941.html) will be committed as soon as 4.3 is open. > we get: > t.c:20: note: not consecutive access > t.c:20: note: not vectorized: complicated access pattern. Vectorization of strided accesses is also already implemented in the autovect branch (and will be committed to the mainline 4.3). However, this case contains stores with gaps (stores to opoints[i][0], opoints[i][1], and opoints[i][2], without a store to opoints[i][3]), and only loads with gaps are currently supported. Therefore, this loop will be vectorizable in the autovect branch (and soon in the mainline 4.3) if a store to opoints[i][3] is added. Ira -- irar at il dot ibm dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |irar at il dot ibm dot com Last reconfirmed|2005-12-21 03:49:03 |2006-09-19 07:10:15 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18438
