------- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-05 08:05 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > I am glad to see that you are pursuing that one. I nearly bust my head on it > my notes indicate that I had a fix that broke everything else; no details, so > not much help I'm afraid. I think that you had better take it that I got > nowhere!
Well, this is really about the resolution scheme, which I still don't fully understand, so I'm in the dark here too. I'll give it a longer shot over the next week-end. > The bug that involves INDEX (PR???) is clearer. The mechanism, in > trans-decl(gfc_get_extern_function_decl), for handling intrinsics simply does > not allow that number of arguments. I tried to extend it by looking at > isym->resolve.f1 and f2. It seemed to work but I did not have time to work on > it. That bug is fixed by my submitted patch about INTRINSICS (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-10/msg00022.html). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27900