------- Comment #15 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-31 11:16 ------- > Eric, it looks like you've got this fixed now: great news. Solaris test > results for 2.10, 2.9, and 2.8 looked fine for the last month and a half, > so I'd assumed this patch was not problematic.
I think it is, up to Solaris 9, but the failure mode is not so blatant. > As a side note, it's hard to deal with paging in and out WRT this bug report > over two months. If we're supposed to care about Solaris-2.5-7, then please, > post test results on a (at least) weekly basis. I'd say that we (the GCC project) have to care about Solaris 7 and up only, at this point. I'm personally interested in Solaris 2.5.1 and 2.6 for some reasons, but I will certainly not bug anyone about them. And, yes, I try to post results on a weekly basis for all Solaris versions: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-10/msg01176.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-10/msg01177.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-10/msg01178.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-10/msg01179.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-10/msg01180.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-10/msg01181.html I don't have any for recent mainline though, but you probably have already guessed why. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29426
