------- Comment #34 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-07 02:46 ------- (In reply to comment #33) > > Okay, sounds fine. Would this make it into 2.2.1 or 2.3? > For compatibility reasons (i.e. the 2.2.x versions must have the same > interface), this can only be in 2.3.0. > > And do you have any very rough timeframe for each release so I can plan > > accordingly for gcc? > A pre-release of 2.2.1 should be there soon; there are still bugs being fixed > (they will be ported to the 2.2 branch once this is complete). > I don't know about 2.3.0; probably in a few months, because there currently > aren't many differences from the 2.2 branch.
Well, maybe if the Bessel functions were added to 2.3.0 it would be sufficiently different from 2.2.x to warrent a release. See comment#22. :-) -- ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL|http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc- | |patches/2006- | |10/msg01039.html | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29335