------- Comment #7 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-11-09 05:35 ------- (In reply to comment #0) > gcc and msvc accept such code but produces different results. > is this code (in)valid? i'm not sure what behaviour is correct.
The code is valid because it is a *partial* specialization of the member template class. It would be invalid if it were a *complete* specialization. In that case, the complete specialization would have to be declared outside the outer class, i.e. at namespace scope. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29767
