------- Comment #2 from aviro at redhat dot com 2006-11-24 15:25 ------- 27301 looks similar to what the first one trips, but passing pointers as suggested by #3 there is not a panacea - testcases 4 and 5 actually deal with that variant. It really looks as if part (but not all) information about the type dies when we leave the scope and we end up stepping into that when working with object afterwards.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29970
