------- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-22 22:25 ------- > No, that means it is used possiable as null. > You need to check inside pure_function to see if there is a way that the > second argument does not get initialized.
There is: if (e->symtree != NULL && e->symtree->n.sym != NULL && e->symtree->n.sym->attr.proc == PROC_ST_FUNCTION) return 1; One could thus either add a line in pure_function or in "resolve_function" to set name to null. Or in both. Having it in "resolve_function" means we get rid of this warning. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30549