------- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-01-22 22:25 -------
> No, that means it is used possiable as null.
> You need to check inside pure_function to see if there is a way that the 
> second argument does not get initialized.

There is:
  if (e->symtree != NULL
        && e->symtree->n.sym != NULL
        && e->symtree->n.sym->attr.proc == PROC_ST_FUNCTION)
    return 1;

One could thus either add a line in pure_function or in "resolve_function" to
set name to null. Or in both. Having it in "resolve_function" means we get rid
of this warning.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30549

Reply via email to