------- Comment #4 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-01-24 04:26 ------- The newest test results for building according to these instructions are here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-01/msg00811.html
Most tests are completed with a dozen (or less) errors - that is not too bad with _every_ possible option enabled. Libmudflap is usable (for debugging, then recompile with the feature off) and most of the errors are "output pattern test" errors (which, to ME, means that the expect script is not catching the output correctly) discounting those errors there are very few errors remaining. I'm looking into the Java test to see why there are so many errors. I did make a couple of bug reports but Java is not my strongest language - I can only hope that someone else will fix it for the cygwin platform :) . Overall 4.2.0 is testing very well (on _my_ platform), there are fewer errors reported than "make -k check" on 4.1.1 (release) - this does not mean it actually "works" better, only that the error checking does not find errors ;) . -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30342
