------- Comment #23 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 12:35 ------- (In reply to comment #22) > Frankly, I think it would make sense to remove completely this XFAIL-ing mess > and just wait for Diego to fix the compiler issue. > Agreed. I don't understand why the rush to XFAIL a test that's obviously exposing a bug. At most, I would like to understand which patch started triggering the failure. It can't have been too long ago, the 2-3 day old mainline tree I have in my box does not have this failure.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768