------- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-17 15:59
-------
I have started looking at this. I believe its a duplicate of 31199. In using
advance=no we are failing to retain or use the information about the maximum
position reached during preceding writes.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 31199 ***
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31207
