------- Comment #4 from mesti_mudam at yahoo dot com 2007-03-26 21:49 ------- ive no idea which part of the standard should imply/allow this. if one replaces "typename T::privIC * priv" with "T * priv", its valid and it compiles. I thought T::privC is equally accessible & 'incomplete' as T itself when instantiating the template. what i want is: class A : public Base<A> class B : public Base<B> etc. all having the same interface, and all of them's private implementation class is called privC. so either in A, B, etc. or later i'll define class A::privC, class B::privC, etc.
maybe we should add this to the standard :) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31323
