------- Comment #5 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-04-14 17:59 -------
I tested successfully the patch proposed by dorit, which changes the report of
these 2 cases to XFAIL for vect_no_align target:
Index: vect-4.f90
===================================================================
--- vect-4.f90 (revision 123409)
+++ vect-4.f90 (working copy)
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
END
! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 1 "vect" } }
-! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Alignment of access forced using
peeling" 1 "vect" } }
-! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 1
"vect" } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Alignment of access forced using
peeling" 1 "vect" { xfail vect_no_align } } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 1
"vect" { xfail vect_no_align } } }
! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "accesses have the same alignment." 1
"vect" } }
! { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "vect" } }
--
tprince at computer dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tprince at computer dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31561
