------- Comment #4 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-16 16:55 ------- Subject: Re: ICE at -O1 -fipa-pta
On 16 Apr 2007 06:03:45 -0000, fxcoudert at gmail dot com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ------- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gmail dot com 2007-04-16 07:03 ------- > Subject: Re: ICE at -O1 -fipa-pta > > > PS, I will fix this sometime after we have LTO. > > Until then, -fipa-pta is not worth it. > > Can it be made an undocumented option, then, for the time being? > Because it's still an ICE on valid code using a documented option :) This is what i originally wanted, but people don't want options that aren't documented :( I'll make the trivial fix for it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31068
