------- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-25 07:38 -------
foo1 (__result, n)
{
bar1 ((int4 *) n, foo1);
goto __return_foo1;
__return_foo1:;
looks strange. Shouldn't this be:
bar1 ((int4 *) n, __result)
In addition, the warning
g.f90:8: warning: Function does not return a value
should be suppressed.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Keywords| |wrong-code
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-04-25 07:38:17
date| |
Summary|function without result |Wrong code when passing
|clause fails to compile |function name as result to
|prperly |procedures
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31692
