------- Comment #5 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-25 11:43 ------- The problem of the cyclic definition is (more or less), the same described in PR24886, isn't it? E.g. replace
implicit character(len(ouch)) (x) implicit character(len(x)+1) (y) intent(in) x,y by character(len=*), intent(in) :: x ! or character(len=n), n integer character(len=len(x)+1), intent(in) :: y to get a working binary. My meaning: "len(ouch)" is not known when defining the length of the dummy argument x, thus it is a length that's different from the actual length. -- dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot | |org OtherBugsDependingO| |19276 nThis| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31306