------- Comment #8 from dorit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-28 19:20 ------- > v0 (and v10 are scratch registers and not saved.
so does it look like a register allocation bug then? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32582
dorit at gcc dot gnu dot org Sat, 28 Jul 2007 12:20:52 -0700
------- Comment #8 from dorit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-28 19:20 ------- > v0 (and v10 are scratch registers and not saved.
so does it look like a register allocation bug then? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32582