------- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-17 08:14 -------
Rejecting "operator(.procedure.)" has been fixed by PR33072.
Accepting multiple renames/imports of an operator ("operator(.op.),
operator(.myop.)=>operator(.op.)") is fixed by the submitted patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg01081.html
Remains to be done:
Supporting "operator(+)=>operator(.myPlusOp.)", which can be based on the
attachment 13369 and the submitted patch.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|wrong-code |rejects-valid
Summary|Uninitialized variable in |F2003: use mod, operator(+)
|f951 (in read_module) / |=> operator(.userOp.) not
|renaming operator in USE |supported
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31298
