------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-02 13:50 ------- Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap check failures ICE's
On 2 Sep 2007 13:42:42 -0000, dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ------- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-09-02 13:42 > ------- > > [18:23] < apinski> between 127935 and 128000 > > Fromp http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/, looking at the results from > "regress", it can be narrowed between 127961 (working) and 127997 (non > working). Note that the last change of final.c is 127941 (outside the range). > From an uneducated guess, I'l say 127989, but I may be completely wrong. >From looking closer to the changes, the scheduler changes is not likely because this happens at -O1 :) I am more thinking it was: 2007-08-31 Richard Sandiford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Which changed optabs which is part of the expansion. The IV change could not have cause this issue as there is no loop in that function so the last change would be the optabs change. -- Pinski -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33277
