------- Comment #3 from jbeulich at novell dot com 2007-09-19 09:39 ------- Isn't this the same as 16602 (which I don't really understand why it was rejected as invalid)? Also, if this *is* invalid, then what proper mechanism does one have to express what is intended here? And why does similar code compile warning free in C++?
-- jbeulich at novell dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jbeulich at novell dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33076