------- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-13 21:18 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > FX, can you have a look? I would not be surprised if one of your debug patches > caused the regression
Me neither. A simple workaround is to simply add a blank line before the INCLUDE statement. This problem is the exact inverse of the one I solved previously (which was about include statements on the last line), but it can't be fixed with the same hack. I'll revert my previous patch, and we'll need to fix this one straight in the scanner, when we read the file for the first time. -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2007-11-13 19:51:09 |2007-11-13 21:18:22 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34084