------- Comment #7 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2007-11-14 13:38
-------
Isn't this warning simply bogus? In other contexts if a default constructor is
available it will be used without warning, whether explicitly used or not.
e.g.
non-virtual bases in constructor initializer lists
data members in constructor initializer lists
"new T" vs "new T()"
"T t;" vs "T t = T();"
This warning seems to be an attempt to enforce someone's personal preference,
rather than any concerns about correctness. As shown by comment 9 on bug
11159, in some cases it's not even possible to do what the warning says you
"should" do.
--
jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot
| |com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5645
