------- Comment #5 from jeidsath at gmail dot com 2007-11-22 00:24 ------- > Of course, and of course. But that has nothing to do with my reduced snippet, > which is equivalent to our standard-conforming implementation of > std::auto_ptr, > as far as I can see, and, does compile, whereas it should not - to be clear, I > think you are therefore right, just there is nothing wrong with our > implementation of std::auto_ptr, if anything, this is a front-end issue. By > the > way, ICC rejects my reduced snippet.
My fault, I see now -- I should have noticed that your copy constructor was a non-const function. I agree that this is a front-end issue. -- jeidsath at gmail dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jeidsath at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34180