------- Comment #21 from rguenther at suse dot de 2007-11-29 11:13 ------- Subject: Re: Missed optimizations
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr wrote: > Richard, > > I am not sure to understand your patch in comment #17. I have already in > gcc/passes.c (after your patch in comment #5): > > NEXT_PASS (pass_merge_phi); > NEXT_PASS (pass_vrp); > NEXT_PASS (pass_dce); > NEXT_PASS (pass_tree_loop_init); > NEXT_PASS (pass_complete_unroll); > NEXT_PASS (pass_tree_loop_done); > NEXT_PASS (pass_cselim); > NEXT_PASS (pass_dominator); > /* The only const/copy propagation opportunities left after > > do you mean that I should change > > NEXT_PASS (pass_complete_unroll); > > to > > NEXT_PASS (pass_complete_unrolli); > > ? I am assuming my interpretation is correct and rebuild gcc right now. Yes, that's correct - I did too much copy&paste there :) Richard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34265