------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-10 10:52 -------
I don't think this qualifies as a 4.3 regression -
http://www.suse.de/~gcctest/SPEC/CINT/sb-haydn-head-64-32o-32bit/index.html
shows that while there were jumps, the numbers close to the 4.2 release are
actually quite similar to what we have now. So, unless somebody produces
numbers with 4.2 or earlier, this is not a 'regression', but a
missed-optimization only.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Component|target |tree-optimization
Keywords| |missed-optimization
Summary|[4.3 regression] non-optimal|non-optimal inlining
|inlining heuristics |heuristics pessimizes gzip
|pessimizes gzip SPEC score |SPEC score at -O3
|at -O3 |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33761
