------- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-06-03 09:17 ------- This is known. At the right time we debated this issue and in fact some people commented that probably TR1 (n1836) should have more conveniently specified <tr1/*>. In any case, also given the status of TR1 of technical report (*not* standard) on the way of the next (so called C++0x) standard, which is the main focus now, while TR1 is in regression fixes-only mode, we are not going to change the paths now, breaking all *our* existing users.
By the way, in C++0x mode, the path is <array>. per the current working drafts. -- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|c++ |libstdc++ Resolution| |WONTFIX Summary|std::tr1 Header Location |std::tr1 Header Location http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36428