------- Comment #7 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-21 17:07 ------- Patch did not fix any those regressions for the AVR:
FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-weakref-1.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?j FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-12.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?foo FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-2.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1a FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-2.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1b FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-2.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1c FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-2.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1e FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-3.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1a FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-3.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1b FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-3.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1c FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-3.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1e FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-4.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?vfoo1a FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-4.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?vfoo1b FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-4.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?vfoo1c FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-5.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?vfoo1a FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-5.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?vfoo1b FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-5.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?vfoo1c FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-5.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?vfoo1i FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-5.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?vfoo1j -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37170
