------- Comment #69 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-30 03:20 ------- (In reply to comment #64) > Not sure what you meant by that comment; that's not what happens here AFAICT. > I stated that output_operand does not see the same symbol_ref as was passed to > the rtl insn expander, so target-specific code is needed just like for Darwin > - or maybe it's just missing in generic code, for the constant pool.
No, that's not it. The TREE_STATIC test is wrong. I should merge extern and (extern) weak handling somehow. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37170
