------- Comment #3 from sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2008-09-24 14:50 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Thanks for the report Salvatore, I'll take this one on. It seems the new > F2003 > features are starting to getting used, from the bug-noise :D > Unfortunately these features are not going to be very useful until CLASS() is implemented; indeed, the code is invalid, but if you change pass(a) into pass(m) it would still be invalid because the makenull procedure should be written with a CLASS() and not a TYPE() argument. In fact, if you comment the second contained subroutine the ICE goes away.
As soon as CLASS() is in you (and PaulT) may expect a lot more noise :-) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37638