------- Comment #3 from mikael dot morin at tele2 dot fr 2008-10-23 21:27
-------
Quickfix (understand: not regression tested):
Index: trans-array.c
===================================================================
--- trans-array.c (révision 141321)
+++ trans-array.c (copie de travail)
@@ -3380,7 +3380,7 @@
{
/* The frontend has worked out the size for us. */
loopspec[n] = ss;
- continue;
+ break;
}
if (ss->type == GFC_SS_CONSTRUCTOR)
This forces to use the array constructor's ss to setup the loop.
As it is zero-based, the upper bounds has the proper value and the array has
the proper size.
I suspect this is only hiding the problem though.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37903
