------- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-17 17:29 ------- According to my reading of the standard, this code is in fact incorrect. This is basically the same as #36320.
I'm beginning to wonder, though, whether this change was overly eager on my part and should be made -pedantic only, or something like that. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38161
