------- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-21 04:14 ------- Regarding comment #2. This is exactly the area I have been investigating, but I don't have anything solid yet.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199
[Bug fortran/38199] [4.4 regression] I/O performance
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:15:35 -0800
- [Bug fortran/38199] New: missed optimiza... manfred99 at gmx dot ch
- [Bug fortran/38199] missed optimizat... jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/38199] missed optimizat... manfred99 at gmx dot ch
- [Bug fortran/38199] [4.4 regression]... burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/38199] [4.4 regression]... manfred99 at gmx dot ch
- [Bug fortran/38199] [4.4 regression]... jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/38199] missed optimizat... pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/38199] missed optimizat... jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
