------- Comment #3 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-22 18:20 -------
With a trivial one-liner patch this could look a lot better:
$ ./cc1plus t.C
void foo()
t.C:6: error: no match for 'operator=' in 'a = ({...})'
t.C:1: note: candidates are: A& A::operator=(const A&)
Execution times (seconds)
name lookup : 0.01 (25%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.01 (25%) wall
82 kB ( 5%) ggc
TOTAL : 0.03 0.00 0.03
1508 kB
Extra diagnostic checks enabled; compiler may run slowly.
Configure with --enable-checking=release to disable checks.
$
Of course, a message reproducing the source line with a carret and all that
would be even better -- hi Aldy! -- but for now this is probably the best we
can do.
Untested, I have no commitment to this patch ;-)
Index: ../../trunk/gcc/cp/error.c
===================================================================
--- ../../trunk/gcc/cp/error.c (revision 142123)
+++ ../../trunk/gcc/cp/error.c (working copy)
@@ -1976,6 +1976,7 @@
break;
case BIND_EXPR:
+ case EXPR_STMT:
case STMT_EXPR:
case STATEMENT_LIST:
/* We don't yet have a way of dumping statements in a
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35335
