------- Comment #5 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 20:37 ------- Subject: Bug 37779
Author: domob Date: Sun Nov 30 20:36:10 2008 New Revision: 142299 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142299 Log: 2008-11-30 Daniel Kraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/37779 * gfortran.h (struct gfc_entry_list): Fixed typo in comment. * resolve.c (is_illegal_recursion): New method. (resolve_procedure_expression): Use new is_illegal_recursion instead of direct check and handle function symbols correctly. (resolve_actual_arglist): Removed useless recursion check. (resolve_function): Use is_illegal_recursion instead of direct check. (resolve_call): Ditto. 2008-11-30 Daniel Kraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/37779 * gfortran.dg/recursive_check_1.f: Changed expected error message to the more general new one. * gfortran.dg/recursive_check_2.f90: Ditto. * gfortran.dg/entry_18.f90: Ditto. * gfortran.dg/recursive_check_4.f03: Do "the same" check also for FUNCTIONS, as this is different in details from SUBROUTINES. * gfortran.dg/recursive_check_6.f03: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/recursive_check_6.f03 Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/gfortran.h trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/entry_18.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/recursive_check_1.f trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/recursive_check_2.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/recursive_check_4.f03 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37779
