------- Comment #7 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2009-01-18 03:58 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Maybe this issue isn't sufficiently clarified in the audit. Unless I'm badly > mistaken (Jon, Chris will correct me), this is not a bug for a C++03 + TR1 > bind > (indeed the testcases provided by Doug are rather clear about that). Only in > C++0x the specs say it must work. Of course implementations can also "fix" it > for C++03 + TR1, but this is not in general the way we are managing these > issues, we prefer leaving the TR1 version alone.
And it should work if you do -std=c++0x, which I believe (from the title of the PR) is what the original intent was. W. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35569
