------- Comment #20 from Joey dot ye at intel dot com 2009-02-17 09:18 ------- (In reply to comment #19) > Just for the record, here is an unsuccessful attempt to avoid stack > realignment > just because of DImode for -m32 or because of DFmode at -m32 -Os. This patch > unfortunately caused a handful regressions, like 20020220-1.c. Is it OK to enable this patch with a new option? Defaultly not to realign a mode (DImode) to its nature boundary is confusing.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39137
