------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-17 11:04 ------- This is perfectly valid C++.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39205
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org Tue, 17 Feb 2009 03:04:54 -0800
------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-17 11:04 ------- This is perfectly valid C++.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39205