------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-02-25 13:37 -------
Subject: Re: Optimize away only set but not used variable
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 25, 2009, at 1:43 AM, "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org"
<gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
> wrote:
>
>
> ------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-25
> 09:43 -------
> Is there a reason the Fortran frontend gives function local
> variables static
> storage duration?
>
Yes, it is larger than the threshhold. Remember fortran has no
recursive functions except for the ones which marked as such.
> a ()
> {
> struct __st_parameter_dt dt_parm.1;
> static integer(kind=4) options.0[8] = {68, 255, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1};
> static complex(kind=4) foo[2147483647];
>
> <bb 2>:
> _gfortran_set_options (8, &options.0);
> foo[9] = __complex__ (1.0e+0, 0.0);
>
>
> --
>
> rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ---
> ---
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
> Ever Confirmed|0 |1
> Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-02-25 09:43:40
> date| |
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39298
>
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39298
