On Linux/x86-64, revision 145191 has following regressions:

FAIL: ext/pb_ds/example/basic_set.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ext/pb_ds/example/basic_set.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/ipa-pta-1.c  -O1  scan-ipa-dump pta "bar.arg0 = {
test4.arg0 test3.arg0 test2.arg0 test1.arg0 }"
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/ipa-pta-1.c  -O1  scan-ipa-dump pta "bar.arg0 = {
test4.arg0 test3.arg0 test2.arg0 test1.arg0 }"
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/ipa-pta-1.c  -O2  scan-ipa-dump pta "bar.arg0 = {
test4.arg0 test3.arg0 test2.arg0 test1.arg0 }"
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/ipa-pta-1.c  -O2  scan-ipa-dump pta "bar.arg0 = {
test4.arg0 test3.arg0 test2.arg0 test1.arg0 }"
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/ipa-pta-1.c  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  scan-ipa-dump pta
"bar.arg0 = { test4.arg0 test3.arg0 test2.arg0 test1.arg0 }"
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/ipa-pta-1.c  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  scan-ipa-dump pta
"bar.arg0 = { test4.arg0 test3.arg0 test2.arg0 test1.arg0 }"
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/ipa-pta-1.c  -O3 -g  scan-ipa-dump pta "bar.arg0 = {
test4.arg0 test3.arg0 test2.arg0 test1.arg0 }"
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/ipa-pta-1.c  -O3 -g  scan-ipa-dump pta "bar.arg0 = {
test4.arg0 test3.arg0 test2.arg0 test1.arg0 }"
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/ipa-pta-1.c  -Os  scan-ipa-dump pta "bar.arg0 = {
test4.arg0 test3.arg0 test2.arg0 test1.arg0 }"
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/ipa-pta-1.c  -Os  scan-ipa-dump pta "bar.arg0 = {
test4.arg0 test3.arg0 test2.arg0 test1.arg0 }"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-strided-same-dr.c (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-strided-same-dr.c (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-strided-same-dr.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-strided-same-dr.c (test for excess errors)


-- 
           Summary: [4.5 regression] Many regressions on trunk
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: middle-end
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39574

Reply via email to