------- Comment #4 from css20 at mail dot ru  2009-04-12 08:50 -------
First tests of Win64 compiler.. simple source file test.c was created:

#include "windows.h"

int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
  MessageBox(NULL, "test", "test", MB_OK);
}

E:\temp\test>gcc test.c
gcc: CreateProcess: No such file or directory

E:\temp\test>gcc -### test.c
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-pc-mingw32
Configured with: ../src/configure --prefix=/usr/win64 --with-sysroot=/usr/win64
--host=x86_64-pc-mingw32 --target=x86_64-pc-mingw32 --enable-languages=c,c++
--d
isable-win32-registry --disable-nls --disable-shared --disable-sjlj-exceptions
-
-with-dwarf2 --disable-libssp --enable-libgomp
Thread model: win32
gcc version 4.4.0 20090407 (prerelease) (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-mtune=generic'
 "e:/mingw64/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-mingw32/4.4.0/cc1.exe" "-quiet"
"-ipre
fix" "e:\\mingw64\\bin\\../lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-mingw32/4.4.0/" "test.c" "-quiet"
"
-dumpbase" "test.c" "-mtune=generic" "-auxbase" "test" "-o"
"C:\\Users\\X\\AppDa
ta\\Local\\Temp\\cciH4k6g.s"
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-mtune=generic'
 " \"" ------> <Here must be assembler path and arguments>

then compiler drivers segfaults.. gdb output:

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
main (argc=3, argv=0x72120) at ../../src/gcc/gcc.c:6848
6848    in ../../src/gcc/gcc.c


code from gcc.c(6848):
  /* Determine if there are any linker input files.  */
  num_linker_inputs = 0;
  for (i = 0; (int) i < n_infiles; i++)
    if (explicit_link_files[i] || outfiles[i] != NULL)
      num_linker_inputs++;


(gdb) p outfiles[i]
$12 = 0x72200 "test.c"
(gdb) p explicit_link_files[i]
No symbol "explicit_link_files" in current context - ???

disassembly listing:
000000000040DB7B  cmp         byte ptr [rbx+rcx],0   <--- rbx & rcx = 0
000000000040DB7F  jne         000000000040DB88 
000000000040DB81  cmp         qword ptr [rdi+rcx*8],0 
000000000040DB86  je          000000000040DB8B 

What is it, incorrect build or compiler driver bug ?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39738

Reply via email to