------- Comment #10 from aph at redhat dot com 2009-04-22 17:33 ------- Subject: Re: 16 symbolic register names generates error: more than 30 operands in 'asm'
> 0) I will build gcc-4.4 and try that. I will also make the 1 line patch to it > to try increasing the number of asm params, and try that. I would prefer that > someone with more guts inside the guts of gcc do the latter, I fear I would > rapidly end up over my head. Is it a magic number or just a stupid default? Try max_recog_operands = FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER*2 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39847